In a blog I posted February 1st, I argued that Obama and Clinton must not settle for a VP position; for if they did, the Democratic Party would not reach the “pinnacle of its political potential.” Instead, I suggested that either Clinton or Obama, depending on who wins their party’s nomination, take a cabinet position, while the former senator from North Carolina and former Democratic presidential candidtate, John Edwards, fills the role of VP.  

  Now, I still stand by this strategy; however, after reading Dan Streib’s column in today’s DI, a gap in its logic has became apparent to me: How do you rally Obama’s supporters (moderate Democrats and independents) and Clinton’s supporters (traditional Democrats) under a single candidate? The answer is simple: the losing candidate must campaign on the winning candidate’s behalf.

  Although John Edwards’ southern charm and good looks may win over some apprehensive voters, they simply do not compensate for the experience Clinton’s Democrats are looking for, nor do they make up for Obama’s fiery rhetoric and inspiring persona. Thus, in order for the Democratic ticket to be seamless, either Obama or Clinton must stand firmly by their party’s choice for the president. Then, once January ‘09 rolls around, they can assume the cabinet position they rightfully deserve.

This entry was posted on Friday, February 8th, 2008 at 1:33 pm and is filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.